McCain INSULTS NCOs

Those of us that have served as Non Commissioned Officers are familiar with the NCO CREED. Today John McCain insulted those of us that live by this creed:

No one is more professional than I. I am a Noncommissioned Officer, a leader of soldiers. As a Noncommissioned Officer, I realize that I am a member of a time honored corps, which is known as "The Backbone of the Army". I am proud of the Corps of Noncommissioned Officers and will at all times conduct myself so as to bring credit upon the Corps, the Military Service and my country regardless of the situation in which I find myself. I will not use my grade or position to attain pleasure, profit, or personal safety.

Competence is my watchword. My two basic responsibilities will always be uppermost in my mind -- accomplishment of my mission and the welfare of my soldiers. I will strive to remain tactically and technically proficient. I am aware of my role as a Noncommissioned Officer. I will fulfill my responsibilities inherent in that role. All soldiers are entitled to outstanding leadership; I will provide that leadership. I know my soldiers and I will always place their needs above my own. I will communicate consistently with my soldiers and never leave them uninformed. I will be fair and impartial when recommending both rewards and punishment.

Officers of my unit will have maximum time to accomplish their duties; they will not have to accomplish mine. I will earn their respect and confidence as well as that of my soldiers. I will be loyal to those with whom I serve; seniors, peers, and subordinates alike. I will exercise initiative by taking appropriate action in the absence of orders. I will not compromise my integrity, nor my moral courage. I will not forget, nor will I allow my comrades to forget that we are professionals, Noncommissioned Officers, leaders!

Today John McCain responded to criticism of his absence from the Senate, as it passed (75-22) the much needed update to our GI BILL.

His insult to us after the jump:

An excerpt of McCain's response:

. . .
The most important difference between our two approaches is that Senator Webb offers veterans who served one enlistment the same benefits as those offered veterans who have re-enlisted several times. Our bill has a sliding scale that offers generous benefits to all veterans, but increases those benefits according to the veteran's length of service. I think it is important to do that because, otherwise, we will encourage more people to leave the military after they have completed one enlistment. At a time when the United States military is fighting in two wars, and as we finally are beginning the long overdue and very urgent necessity of increasing the size of the Army and Marine Corps, one study estimates that Senator Webb's bill will reduce retention rates by 16%.

"Most worrying to me, is that by hurting retention we will reduce the numbers of men and women who we train to become the backbone of all the services, the noncommissioned officer. In my life, I have learned more from noncommissioned officers I have known and served with than anyone else outside my family. And in combat, no one is more important to their soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen, and to the officers who command them, than the sergeant and petty officer. They are very hard to replace. Encouraging people not to choose to become noncommissioned officers would hurt the military and our country very badly. . . .

Senator McCain, my friend, you should know that every year soldiers are afforded $4,500 of tuition assistance to use for higher education while they serve. There is already this build-up of benefits, as an 11-year veteran has had the opportunity to use up to $45,000 more than a Private with a year of experience.

Senator McCain, my friend, are you going to lead our country by relying on ONE STUDY that thinks retention rates will drop 16% with an updated GI BILL? Retention rates have been fine over the last few years, and this is during a period of poor civilian management. I have optimism that DOD management can only improve next year, and this will improve retention rates even more.

Those of us that decided to reenlist over the last decade have done so, for the most part, because we love our country . . . not because we wish we had a better GI BILL. The Junior Enlisted ranks are not naive. These future NCOs are a brave new generation of soldiers that volunteered to serve our country after 9/11. They volunteered to serve their country in a time of war, and DESERVE this new GI BILL! Encouraging some of them to go to college is what we did after World War II, and is the least we could do after what they have gone through during the Global War on Terrorism.

Senator McCain, my friend, you should know better than to guide your veteran policy by ONE STUDY. You worked with NCOs during your respectable military career, so you should know us better than that! You should know better than to insult our intelligence and patriotism.


Take a moment to remember our Service Members that can't join us this Memorial Day weekend.



Display:


Tips to Vets . . . (2.00 / 5)

Happy Memorial Day!


NO 100 year WAR, NO McConnell run Senate, & NO GOP-led Supreme Court!!!
by Veteran75 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:21:08 PM EST

Re: Tips to Vets . . . (2.00 / 2)

I hope that one day finally our government will respect the troops who maintain it's status quo as more than just pawns in political games and pursuits of profit and ideology.

We need to put our troops, our citizens and our constitution ahead of said political games and ideologic driven wars.

Please view this video and share it with friends:

Please support VoteVets, WesPAC, IAVA and Bravenewfilms


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:44:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tips to Vets . . . (2.00 / 2)

EXCELLENT Video!

I would rec, but I came back from vacation . . . and my rec power was gone???


by FOB92 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:52:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tips to Vets . . . (2.00 / 1)

Rec'd!!!!


by Obamanaut on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:58:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain INSULTS NCOs (2.00 / 2)

Lord, I think at this point McCain and those closely associated with him have just about directly insulted everyone in one form or another.

If we can heal ourselves in time McCain is in for a world of hurt this Nov.


by notedgeways on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:24:36 PM EST

kinda redundant with front page (none / 0)

no?


Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:33:09 PM EST

Re: kinda redundant with front page (2.00 / 1)

I read the front page, and it didn't get to how those of us involved with the GI BILL personally feel about McCain's statements. I thought it was worth the new angle.


NO 100 year WAR, NO McConnell run Senate, & NO GOP-led Supreme Court!!!
by Veteran75 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:37:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: kinda redundant with front page (1.00 / 1)

Are you aware discussions allow people to comment?


Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:46:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: kinda redundant with front page (2.00 / 1)

With the massive ammount of reduncancy on the most trivial issues I scratch my head at your 'concern'.

Were talking about John McCain, not only is he against our troops on many fronts, he was once a soldier too and he holds a bond any of us soft civilians can never have, which makes him even worse.

The biggest tragedy this season will be any military votes cast for John McCain.


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:39:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

learn the language (none / 0)

McCain was a "Navy officer" and a "Naval aviator".


Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:47:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: kinda redundant with front page (none / 0)

100% KUDOS

Where is the outrage on this?

I guess it is almost time to smoke out the McCainiacs on MyDD!


by Obamanaut on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:58:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: trolls (none / 0)

They will be obvious when we have our nominee after June 4  - IMHO.


NO 100 year WAR, NO McConnell run Senate, & NO GOP-led Supreme Court!!!
by Veteran75 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 04:03:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain INSULTS NCOs (1.50 / 2)

So... nobody joins the military for money, training or benefits? By your title, I expected something a bit more, well, insulting. His failure to vote for the GI bill is insulting to all members of the service, but the alleged insult to NCOs in particular is a stretch - particularly in the context of the standard (and appropriate) acknowledgment that most officers wouldn't make it to senior status without the help of NCOs.


by Mobar on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:42:12 PM EST

Re: McCain INSULTS NCOs (2.00 / 1)

I joined initially for some of those benefits, but I stayed for my country. I am sorry that the diary does not live up to your standards.

I wrote it quickly, and from the heart after reading McCain's upsetting statement.


NO 100 year WAR, NO McConnell run Senate, & NO GOP-led Supreme Court!!!
by Veteran75 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:45:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain INSULTS NCOs (none / 0)

I'm not doubting your sincerity, just offering a different perspective.


by Mobar on Thu May 22, 2008 at 04:14:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain INSULTS NCOs (2.00 / 1)

I think McCain insulted all soldiers with his acceptance of torture carried out by our military is acceptable and not a head shot to the honor, dignity and credibility of all our soldiers, let alone put them in danger of being tortured.

Sorry, but when it comes to the military McCain is fair game no matter how much the stretch.
I personally believe that he hates the military as much as Bush does.

A soldier or any man of honor doesn't come back to a wife who waited 5 years, cheat on her and remarry the millionaire woman who jumpstarted his new career in politics.
real classy.

www.therealmccain.com


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:48:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain INSULTS NCOs (none / 0)

Sign me up on the list that says it's ok to attack McCain on military issues. I just prefer the more obvious routes - like, being a POW isn't valuable foreign policy experience. Or, that naval aviators are known for many characteristics, but a mastery of strategic issues and overall cost/benefit analysis are not among them. And I agree with you about torture and MCA. I've been unimpressed with McCain's "bulletproof" patriotism/military credentials for years but kept my mouth shut in the face of the overwhelming public opinion to the contrary. After his actions giving cover for the MCA, I decided I don't know a word strong enough to describe what a miserable soulless grasping and unprincipled ass the man is.


by Mobar on Thu May 22, 2008 at 04:20:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Dear Obamaunot (none / 0)

You are an idiot. If you're going to troll rate me, at least let me earn it.


by Mobar on Thu May 22, 2008 at 04:12:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Dear Obamaunot (none / 0)

I would up-rate you if I could, but my powers disappeared when I came back this week.

I don't think you are a freeper, but I do think MyDD and DKOS can both get sensitive towards kindness of McCain.


by FOB92 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 04:17:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Dear Obamaunot (none / 0)

Thanks. I didn't think it was kindness to McCain, just the way it read to me logically. I wouldn't want to be mistaken for someone who thinks that crazy old goat has passed any threshhold other than the retirement threshhold.

And it cracks me up that despite the ability to go and look at a poster's comment history, that the quick shot raters rarely seem to do so to confirm their suspicions. It's funny to watch people accidentally troll rating their fellow travelers because they misread comments in their haste.


by Mobar on Thu May 22, 2008 at 04:33:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wake up- McCain is going to start another war (none / 0)

so why would he support more benefits? He could care less. He is 40 years and hundreds of millions of dollars removed from his military service. He doesn't care- if he did he never would have supported this looney ill-advised strategic blunder and instead of learning from it he wants to start "more wars." Way to go McCain McWar McDraft.


by Voxlisa999 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 04:19:23 PM EST

Re: Wake up- McCain is going to start another war (none / 0)

He must be far removed from his military experiences.

There is little excuse for him to use one study.


NO 100 year WAR, NO McConnell run Senate, & NO GOP-led Supreme Court!!!
by Veteran75 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 04:23:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Wake up- McCain is going to start another war (none / 0)

One of the tragedies of the war in Iraq is that our troops were committed based on false evidence;  there was a blackout on facts both in top echelons of our administration, and in the media.

We even had government "special ops" "analysts" lying to us about the case for war, progress of the war, and to date there has been NO fiscal accountability for corporations in a war zone by no-bid contracts linked to the personal fortunes and careers of our highest leaders.  

Our corporate owned media long stopped functioning as performing its job to hold government and the corporate leadership accountable; now they are owned by corporations, and our government is infiltrated with them.

A futher concern is that the individuals leading the decision for war are enmeshed with the very businesses getting these no bid contracts, and who, to date, have had no accountability or oversight.

Senator McCain is part of a hegemony that has blurred the role of government with the will of corporations.  While his actions as a POW deserve everyone's admiration and respect, he has been part of a military/industrial machine, and has been the face of its policies for too long. Who better than to enact its policies than a brave POW.

The expense of this war is astronomical and was inadequately assessed by the administration, including the Armed Services Committee as well as the Pentagon.  The human costs were grossly underestimated, and this is where Senator McCain and George Bush's policies are looking to cut costs.  There is no oversite of the corporations involved in this.  Just penny pinching for soldiers.  

While corporations have had unbridled funding with no oversight whatsoever, our military are being nickel and dimed to the point where there are secret memos being circulated asking VA service providers to deliberately commit malpractice by giving false diagnosiis, and suicide rates are grossly under reported.  Military quarters, accesss to benefits, and the smallest acts of recovery and rehabilitation are  complicated by byzantine paperwork, lack of available care, and endless debates about who qualifies.

The odd part is, a soldier is perhaps more likely to be wounded in a life altering way on a first rotation as on the fifteenth in any war.  It is also true that the newest and lowliest recruits get the most dangerous tasks.  Which is why the GI bill is vital.  These folks are risking a roll of the dice and many are "culled" from the ranks early on.  These are the folks that see their friends killed, and witness the gore firsthand. They are dependent on our government for adequate training in order to survive.  This can be another area of cost-cutting.  As can adequate protections for the soldiers at the lowest level and highest risk of deployment.

Now they are being asked to further the economic agenda of people who are rewarded like kings, but are increasingly cheese paring when it comes to treating their fellow Americans as equals in worth and humanity. The corporate heads of these entities are bankrolling McCain, who is also voting to undermine and ultimately eradicate the public education system, and this has undermined all avenues toward the development of worthwhile jobs or any other means of livelihood.  Jobs are going where labor is cheapest and least resistant to mistreatment.

The NCO's who leave the military often do so for very good reasons, and become the voice of advocacy for soldiers in critiquing military policies and government decisions that insure that wars are pursued in a just way, and that the military's power has checques and balances.  These are also folks who leave the military when the higher and more removed commanders demonstrate incompetence.  Perhaps John McCain should look at what that study might be saying about the leadership of our nation, and the belief that this is a just and well-managed war.

Manipulating GI benefits while enriching corporate plunder of our economy is a loser policy and a significant hypocrisy.

One of my most admired friends left the military.  He would have been a career NCO having served for so many years, and would have risen even further in rank, but he observed deficiencies in training and equipment during the build up to the Vietnam war, and his efforts to point this out as a man who loved those under his command were ignored and subject to intimidation. The GI Bill allowed him to go into the ministry. If the military fails to retain soldiers who would like to continue to serve, it should be investigating conditions that make this happen, not voting efforts to further hurt our economy and military strength.

He is an advocate for soldiers and veterans groups.  The fact that he was ignored, and so many died, weighed on him.  He saw men being doomed from the start in that war.  He WANTED to be career military, but he was rendered irrelevant by his commanders, like Senator McCain, who have more priviledged and more political agendas to pursue.

It is one thing to demand that soldiers serve endless and undetermined military stays, beyond the terms of their enlistment.  That is likely to have affected this single study and this study likely didn't account for this.

Senator McCain is an anachronism from the past.  He wants war.  Its good for business and he could have held the corporations accountable to reduce costs; instead he is cutting costs by cutting benefits to soldiers, and riding with corporate elites on his bus.  Sad compromise of a hero.


by URKnot on Sat May 24, 2008 at 06:11:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You're right (none / 0)

Soldiers become NCOs because they display leadership.  Leaders can't be coerced and still remain 100% effective.

Basically, what he's saying is, "Our military will fall apart if we give our sergeants a reason to leave."

What he doesn't realize is that any decision to leave the service will weigh heavily on a NCO who cares about his or her troops.  It will not be a light decision... but Captain John Sydney McCain III, son of an admiral, has never had to worry about that particular problem.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.

That One/Another Fella '08

by Dracomicron on Thu May 22, 2008 at 04:41:29 PM EST

Re: You're right (none / 0)

Good point.

I must also add that I joined the Armed Forces in the nineties, and there is a positive difference in the post 9/11 recruits . . . many of whom are young NCOs now.

This new generation of Soldiers is truly a new "greatest generation" that looks past the benefits that McCain is "concerned" about from ONE STUDY!


NO 100 year WAR, NO McConnell run Senate, & NO GOP-led Supreme Court!!!
by Veteran75 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 04:53:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I have to wonder (none / 0)

How much will recruitment go up when people are proud of their commander-in-chief again?


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.

That One/Another Fella '08

by Dracomicron on Thu May 22, 2008 at 05:20:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have to wonder (none / 0)

I have smiled inside when I think about the potential.

We may lose a few, but I will be proud of the many more we gain!


NO 100 year WAR, NO McConnell run Senate, & NO GOP-led Supreme Court!!!
by Veteran75 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 06:49:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.